The work between decisions, handled.

Fill prepares the next step, carries out supported actions and brings exceptions to the right person. Your team keeps control of who you engage, what you commit and what happens outside policy. Clear permissions. Visible actions. Human approval where required.

Trusted by ambitious companies

A clear path from trigger to next step.

A request changes, a response arrives or a review becomes due. Fill uses the relevant records and configured rules to carry out supported work, then either completes the step or asks for the decision it needs.

Trigger

A request changes, a supplier response is recorded or a review date arrives. Configured events and schedules start the case. Nobody has to prompt it.

Context

⊞Draft RFP from brief
◎Score vendor responses
≡Reconcile invoices
▣Onboard new consultant
⌘Benchmark a rate card
◈Quarterly vendor review

The workflow identifies the relevant records and the policy that applies. If the framework is missing or expired, the state is Review required, not a confident guess.

Supported action

EM
JR
SK
Kick-offWk 1Wk 2Live

Prepare or carry out the permitted step: draft, send, compare, flag. Arithmetic is deterministic. AI helps summarise, it does not improvise the total.

Decision, if required

Trained on your rate cards

The case reaches the authorised person with the evidence and the impact. Approve the exception, request a revised rate or return it for clarification. Nothing binding happens without them.

Recorded result

RoleRFPPOSpend
Admin●●●
Approver●●○
Viewer○○●

The proposal reviewed, the decision maker, the decision, the time and the resulting action stay on the record. A queued email is not a delivered one; a prepared contract is not a signed one.

Defined permissions, not unlimited autonomy

Reading information, preparing an action and committing the organisation are different permissions, set by the access and approval rules agreed for your programme. A supplier message is data, never an instruction.

“The key for us was to create a process that gives Procurement better oversight and control without making things more complicated for our hiring managers. With Fill, we have been able to standardise the way we work, reduce manual administration and make the process easier to navigate across the organisation.”
Svein Gunnberg
Head of Procurement
“Switching off our MSP and onto Fill cut our consultant rate-card by 14% in the first quarter — and we finally have audit-ready visibility per supplier, per consultant, per cost line.”
Head of Procurement
KOMATSU FOREST
“We replaced six MSP touchpoints with one Fill workspace. Our finance team reconciles consultant invoices in hours instead of weeks — and the rate benchmarks paid for the platform in our first quarter.”
Anna Lindqvist
HEAD OF SOURCING, SÖDERBERG & PARTNERS
“The MSP model never gave us control. Fill gave it back — and the EU residency, GDPR posture and Compliance controls were already in place on day one. No more chasing reports across six providers.”
Julia Karimson Stenberg
Head of people engagement, NOBA BANK
Built for
EnterprisesProcurementHRFinanceHiring managers
Spend by department · Q4
⊞Spend visibility

Cost review: what is committed, reported and invoiced, kept apart. Finance approves.

Audit log · Last 24h
Contract signed14:02
Rate updated11:48
RFP awarded09:13
⊞Audit & control

Every action recorded: actor, source, rule, result. The audit is a read, not a reconstruction.

Subsidiaries on Fill
Komatsu Forest42
Lov Group28
Storskogen Trade61
⊞Group-scale negotiation

Rate review: the submitted rate against your framework, the difference calculated, the exception prepared. You decide.

Run RFP — Senior backend developer
Drafting brief…
Inviting suppliers
Scoring responses
Awaiting signature…
⧉Sourcing & RFPs

Request preparation: a brief becomes a request ready for review, with missing details visible.

Active consultants — All vendors
Janica EllisenKnowit
Sophie HabibSigma
Clara PedersenHiQ
⊞Vendor governance

Assignment follow-through: upcoming changes and renewals reach the owner before they are due.

Rate benchmarks · Senior backend
≡Rate intelligence

Rate exception: SEK 1 100 submitted against a 1 050 ceiling. 1 040 planned hours. Impact SEK 52 000. Approval required.

Compliance dashboard
NDA signed
BankID verified
GDPR consent
Tenure check pending
⊞Compliance

Compliance checks: documents and tenure limits tracked. A missing item names who must supply it.

Onboarding — Sara Lindh
Welcome packet sent
Identity verified
Access granted
Day-one meeting set
⧉Onboarding

Onboarding: the requirement, its owner and its state. Access shows as granted only when IT confirms it.

Headcount forecast · H1
≡Workforce planning

Programme monitoring: the cases matching a configured condition, with reasons and owners.

Budget · Engineering · Q4
Committed€1.42M
Invoiced€0.93M
Plan€1.53M
Within planCommitted lands at approval, not at invoice
Budget control

Committed spend lands when the engagement is agreed, not when it is billed.

Reconciliation · March
INV-20411 · TingentNo timesheet
INV-20418 · KnowitRate mismatch
INV-20422 · GazellaMatched
INV-20430 · CapaMatched
36 of 38 matched automatically · 2 exceptions to resolve
Data for reporting

Invoice review: invoice lines against contract and approved time. Matched cases flow. Exceptions reach finance.

New request · 40 seconds ago
“I need a senior backend developer for a payments integration, six months, starting September.”
BackendSenior6 monthsSeptemberPSD2
Request draftedNo procurement form to learn
One sentence in

Describe the need in a sentence. Fill drafts the request. You confirm it.

Shortlist · ranked
1A. Lindqvist · Knowit845 SEK92%
2M. Sandberg · Sigma880 SEK88%
3J. Ahmed · Nordic Talent910 SEKOver
Ranked against your brief · interviews bookable from here
Candidates back

Candidate comparison: evidence, rate and availability side by side. The choice stays yours.

Rate exceptions · open
Data eng · Knowit€705+12%
Security · Detechtiv€820+9%
Backend · Tingent€560At band
Two of forty-two above band, both with a written exception
Avoid cost overruns

Supplier coordination: invitations sent, quiet suppliers chased, responses organised into one comparison.

Interview · this week
Tue 12 Mar · 09:00Booked
Tue 12 Mar · 11:30Offered
Wed 13 Mar · 14:00Offered
Booked from your real calendar — no thread about Tuesday
Straight to interview

Interviews: slots proposed and confirmed with the participants, without the email thread.

Ask Fill

Ask about the work. See the records behind the answer.

Use a question to understand a request, an assignment or a programme view. Follow the answer back to the records it came from, then take the next permitted action.

Analytics / Contingent workforce Q3 2026 KF
Contingent spend
18,3 MSEK
+12% vs Q2
Active consultants
213
19 renew within 60 days
Open requests
94
across 6 competencies
Top suppliers by spendMSEK
Nordvind Consulting4,2
Skiftläge AB3,0
Hammarby Tech2,2
Lagom Digital1,4
Bergslund IT1,1
Open demand by competencySuppliers
React / TypeScript38%14
Data engineering19%6
Cloud / DevOps16%11
Product design11%9
Security8%3
Cloud & DevOps rate vs your frameworkSEK / hour
700785870Q2 25Q3 25Q4 25Q1 26Q2 26Q3 26Your framework rate838 — 10% over

Illustrative data. Every answer names the rows it was computed from.

Model Context Protocol

Use the access point that fits your workflow.

Where supported, connect an approved assistant to the same records and permissions. The access point can change. The authority and the action record do not.

FillConnected

Available to the assistant

spend_by_departmentread
supplier_historyread
engagement_statusread
rate_benchmarkread
create_requestneeds approval

Illustrative. Scope follows the role the person already has in Fill.

Connect once

Add Fill to an MCP-compatible client. Sign-in runs through the SSO you already use, so nobody gains access they did not already have.

Ask where you work

Rates, contracts, engagement status and supplier history become answerable without opening another tab — and every answer still names the rows it came from.

Reading is open. Acting is not.

An assistant can look at anything the person can. Changing an engagement still goes through Fill’s approval flow and lands in the same audit log.

Built for enterprise,
secure by design

GDPR
GDPR
EU AI
EU AI Act
ISO
ISO 27001 ready
Data
EU data residency
EU DSA
EU Platform work directive

Start with a workflow, not an AI promise.

Discuss your workflow